Over the last few years, we’ve been getting some bills.
It started with false fire alarm bills. A couple hundred a shot. Then the rectory was set a sewage bill. More recently, the city mistakenly invoiced churches a few hundred dollars for a service.
I’m not against charging churches for services. I think we’re lucky to be tax-exempt, and cities have a right to establish some criteria for churches who benefit from the support of the community. But as the Wall Street Journal reports, there is a major shift on the horizon, and it will put pressure on our institutions. Enormous pressure.
About thirty years ago, churches often benefited from the noblesse oblige of wealthy members. They would sometimes pay down the end of year budget. They might pay the first check at the beginning of the year.
Ironically, when tax rates were higher, churches probably received more donations from its prosperous members. But over the last couple of political generations, we’ve not seen a rise in donations among the powerful.
In part because our assumptions regarding how the prosperous spend money are wrong. Nobody has an instinctive urge to give. As classes interact less the powerful become a little more arrogant and impatient.
The second is that an individual with money behaves rationally with their money. Money does not bestow wisdom; it does not insulate from error. They can be tyrants or indulgent. They can be whimsical or intentional, magnanimous or miserly. But there is no reason to idealize their smarts or energy.
What does this have to do with churches paying more bills? As the “resourced” abdicate their responsibility to maintain the social contract, states are too afraid to ask them to pay their fair share. This means more will be expected from those who are active in not-for-profits, churches and other institutions that rely on public support. Lower taxes upon property owners and the well-paid means that we’ll be expected to pay for more.
It’s optimistic to assume that lower taxes mean that people will be more generous with what they do have. I’m sure some families will do so. But we are inclined to adjust to our incomes, and at some point what was once an unexpected windfall becomes our perpetual expectation. It’s easy to think we deserve our wealth, and that we are instinctively generous toward others. The church, however, teaches that it’s all a gift of God, and that we our generosity is never enough, except through His grace.
I think there might be good criteria to keep ourselves off the public dole; but we’ve implicitly rejected the idea that there is a common good worth having, or that the prosperous might willingly sacrifice for the sake of others. The survival of the third sector economy, and its ability to take care of the least fortunate, requires the commitment of all stripes. But alas, too many think they give enough.