Dieting

Over the years I’ve tried numerous diets. I’m a bit of a hedonist, a gourmand, of the self-styled kind, and think food and drink are pleasures that we are supposed to enjoy. Jesus was called a “glutton and a drunkard” and the wisdom writers commend carnal pleasures as reliable.

Still, the New Testament prudes do make points about “self control.” When David Frum compares Obama’s abstemiousness to Rush’s indulgences, I understand what the NT writers want to exemplify.

My friend Matt and I used to discuss diets in Divinity School. He was a fan of the Zone Diet, but I always glazed over at the math it required. In principle, long-term changes in lifestyle do require discipline and attention to detail. I’m not sure if counting is what I want to do. Is there a way to make losing weight as convenient as putting it on?

The challenge is to make self-control easy, or at least easier. It seems difficult to make the will work on too many fronts at once. It took me years to stop buying candy or a haagen-daz ice cream bar, or two martinis as Cipriani while waiting for the train at Grand Central. But the last time I lost 30 lbs (of which I still have about 12 lbs off), was because I did a few things which Mehmet Oz and Dr. Fuhrman agree. I tried to create a handful of rules I could do all at once

I don’t do all of these things now, but when I did, I felt great!

First, I never missed a 1/2 hour walk or some other kind of activity. It might have meant walking to church, biking to the gym, or even biking to downtown white plains for a meeting. This was in addition to going to the gym and doing some kind of interval training. The morning walk was non-negotiable. Eventually, three days a week, I made it into a walk-run thing.

I always had nuts around. Before lunch and dinner I’d usually eat a handful. This helped with my appetite control.

I could eat two bites of anything I wanted. So I shared french fries when I went out, and instead of eating 10 wings alone, I’d invite my brother out and we’d share.

I learned to deliberately waste food or select appetizers when I went out to eat.

The other hard rule I had: one huge salad every day. And when I was obsessed, I had only three meals I ate. Morning – oatmeal or granola. Afternoon, a veggie soup and a half peanut butter on crazy wholesome heavy bread. Evening, just salad with some salsa and tuna. If I got really hungry, I had miso soup.

This meant no beer or Indian Food: my personal variation of the South Beach Diet. I never went extreme – I always had some carbs – but I have been able to generally give up candy and french fries. But I’ve recently been consuming a lot of beer, and when I get stressed, Indian food is what I eat. It gives me pleasure.

Overall, I feel good about what I eat. I don’t drink soda. I’ve not had fast food since the last time I took a road trip. Even the potato chips I ate last night were home made. I prefer to make the food I eat, and have pretty much eliminated anything that has more than four syllables from my diet. Still, last night, late, I made a bowl of pasta and made a asian style sauce with bok-choi and kale. It was a lot of calories. Good nutrition, but still calories.

But here are the books I’ve found helpful:

You on a Diet: This has the bet science, and some of the best tools. It focuses less on weight, and more on the waist.

Eat to Live: I hate this book, but it is the most convincing about the relationship between health and nutrition. Essentially it is for New Testament Prudes – vegetarians – who want to wag their fingers at those of us who love bacon. It distills the science from the largest nutrition study in the world: the China study. In sum, eat your plants. Stay away from oils and meat based products. You can have a little meat if you want, but if you do, you’re a loser and going to die. What I learned? Eat a pound of lettuce at every meal. Because the salad is the main meal, not the meat.

The Beck Diet
: This book is about the will, and applies Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to dieting. It’s meant to be in conjunction with other diets. Planning your meals out weeks in advance seems like a pain in the neck, but I suspect that’s the real secret.

and Food Matters: Mark Bittman is applied Michael Pollan. Eat like a vegan until dinner, and then eat as you please. But always eat food your great grandmother would have recognized as food. This is for those of use who want to live well and live right with the planet.

On Noah

In scripture, one idea that returns over and over is that of “covenant.” The myth is like so: God punishes humanity for its sin, sees what he has done, and promises never to punish humanity ever again, and makes a covenant with all life. The symbol of that covenant is the rainbow.

Although I’m sure we all breath a sigh of relief that God has made such a promise to protect all life, I still find the story a little disturbing. I find destroying an entire civilization a bit… a little extreme, perhaps over the top, and – if I may say so – a little psychotic. And then He wants to apologize?

It is as if that we’re being told, “Look God’s peaceful now. He used to be violent. Aren’t we glad he changed?” I am. Although there are times where I wonder if people (or God), really change. Should I be looking over my shoulder to see if God has it in for me? Isn’t God changeless?

So why is it that God gets really angry at his children? He threatens punishment, even though scripture also says he is, most of the time, slow to anger.

Let’s first admit that this anthropomorphic soldier God is useful to a point. It’s not absolutely useful, but it provides a little object for the imagination. We can be thankful that a former soldier God wants to become a peacemaker. I think of the great Indian King Ashoka, who after seeing the rivers of bodies and blood that he was responsible for, gave up all war and built his kingdom for the sake of peace and prosperity for all his people. We don’t need to end the story with God being a man on a chariot. God is fundamentally a peacemaker. It may seem, on our worst days, that God has it in for us. But our trust is that he wants us to thrive.

It might be that we had not learned from the story of Cain and Abel. They had competed for God’s attention. God chose a favorite. And Abel was killed. What does this say? Violence is a consequence of believing that we have to compete for God’s attention.

We don’t. There may be people who prosper more than we do, who seem to have the abundance of God’s blessings; but we are still expected to care for each other. It was a violent society that the scriptures say God wanted to cleanse.

To me our current financial mess (What’s next? Our Pensions?), looks a lot like a world-wide deluge. Might our civilization crumble if credit disappears? Our promises in the future, based upon the immaterial photons of light, the LED screens that represented the great wealth we thought we had, now gone.

The cash we thought was there was a ghost. We built castles with it; we asked it to fund our universities; we even played poker with it and took its money. And now, it has vanished, and the pundits hope that the ghosts will once again return.

But there is one road to salvation – and that is trust. The rainbow that the scriptures tell us that God gave is the Lord saying, “trust me.” If you think trust makes no sense, you would be absolutely right. There are few good reasons to trust: nobody wants to open their books; they won’t take risks to hire; they won’t expand. People do not trust each other’s accounting; they withdraw and withold from each other. They’ve been burned, and they won’t get burned again. And with that the whole economy can come crushing down. They are justified in their suspicion, and with that, the flood begins, and we will all be drowning.

What happened during the flood? A violent world was destroyed, and replaced with a new differentiation of animals, a new tribal system that brought peace and order.

The scriptures, however, give some clues as to what this might mean. In Peter “a few, that is eight persons, were saved through water. Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you.” We have all been touched by the flood, but through this, we are brought up and out and another stage of peace will come before us.

We are reminded that trusting one another means we are responsible for each other; that we invest in each other; that we empower one another. And it makes little sense – our instinct is to flee, to demand our own needs get satisfied first, to wait for others to save us.

There is a brighter future on the horizon, that will come out of being baptized in the current disaster. We might not see it now. but as the deluge begins, it is our trust in each other, that web of relationships that God has invited us into, that will lift us up and sustain us in these coming days. Peter indicates that even the righteous, the ark itself, was baptized by the flood. But this was just a prelude for what we will see.

Before us, land.

Live Blogging Barack’s Address

10:10 pm We are not a nation of quitters.

smart rhetoric.

10:04 And a story about the bank president who had a lot of money and gave it away. It’s like a parable. And a challenge to the elite. Damn. This hits on so many different levels.

Hope is found in unlikely places.

The hero captain gets a shot.

Veterans are going to be making money.

9:59 A dig at terrorists in Pakistan. Kind of easy.

Shot of McCain with a Maine Senator

He’s clarifying the tax cuts. Beautiful.

He’s including stuff in the budget.

9:55 The deficit…

that he inherited…

No earmarks… Got some catcalls.

We’ll see about agribusiness. No more no-bid contracts in Iraq.

Damn.

swiping the DOD.

9:52 Education. No education, economic decline. Insure access to a complete, and competitive education to everyone.

This will go well in the heartland.

9:46 He continues to be the teacher, addressing our highest moral values. Preventative care; curing disease.

“It will be hard. The cost of our health care has weighed down our conscience or our economy.” Yep, this brings me to tears. It cannot wait another year.

No more quitting on your country.

He’s using remarkably conservative rhetoric.

He wants college graduates, but I am skeptical about the worth of college for all people….

9:40 pm “Our job is to solve the problem.”

“It’s not about helping banks. It’s about helping people.” He’s good.

He’s teaching the multiplier effect.

“rewards drive, punishes short cuts and abuse. Make long term investments.”

A budget as a blueprint. Yep: budgets are moral documents.

We will all have to sacrifice.

Barack is getting historical: railroads, public education, the GI Bill, highways, the moon. Government catalyzed private enterprise.

Energy, health care and education.

He uses a little ethnocentrism to justify his government program.

I’d get a little tired standing all the time.

9:23 “I don’t believe in bigger government. I know about the deficit.” If we don’t do anything, we will be weaker.

57 policemen have their jobs.

Obama is expressing care for the people.

He addresses criticism. There will be oversight. By Biden. Good move.

People will be held accountable.

Good rhetoric.

9:30 pm What are people reading?

9:27 He’s teaching. Credit has stopped flowing. I wonder if people are taking notes.

Hilary has jet lag.

Loans to the entrepreneurs who keep this economy running.

Obama is addressing specific policy proposals in a way that is direct.

9:15 “Take Responsibility.” Good use of a moral tone. He’s challenging the people and the congress for not thinking long term.

Pelosi looks distracted.

Should Episcopalians Convert Non-Believers?

From the London Times: The move was proposed by Paul Eddy, a lay member from the Winchester diocese, who said that he was aware of the religious and cultural tensions in many parishes in England. He also understood “the distress that talk of the historic Crusades can evoke” and that, to some, sharing the Christian gospel equates to sharing the “values of the West”.

He quoted Mahatma Gandhi’s advice to British missionaries to India: “I would suggest first of all that all of you Christians, missionaries and all, begin to live more like Jesus Christ. Second, practise your religion without adulterating or toning it down.”

He said that the uniqueness of Christ must not be compromised by Anglicans. “It does no harm for the Church to re-state it’s beliefs time and time again and then to go further — in this case commending good practice in making that belief known.”

I’m not sure exactly what “conversion” is. Personally, I think Christians should be converted first. Perhaps toward forgiveness and irony. And then we might want to ask if we are merely inviting people into our cult?

A better view of conversion, perhaps, is to offer a new lens by which people can see their lives. It is less indoctrination than an invitation to a shared experience of the transcendent. When we talk about “metanoia,” the changing of one’s mind, it is always toward truth. And the minimalist truth is that love is what creates meaning, and that this is a creative act, and in these acts, we give life and witness to God’s own power.

Blogroll

Fr. Jake encourages us to listen, offering a wonderful faith story.

Learning to see how God is constantly redeeming this world requires a little practice. It requires us to set aside our view of our lives as a series of good times and bad times, with shades of both in between. Instead, we seek out the movement of God. And the movement of God is always from glory to glory. Our task is to set aside our perceptions of what is going on, and then move with God, from faith, to faith, and so become partners in God’s work of redemption.

If we are to be evangelists, it is important that we learn to look out at the world from the perspective of redemption. What is God doing in this situation? How will this be redeemed? It is from this perspective that we can let go of our mission, and begin to participate in God’s mission.

Fr. Tim goes to a dog show.

I guess what really turned me off was that the dogs involved weren’t actually acting like dogs. There was no mischief or nipping at the judges’ heels or inappropriate scratching. They were all too perfect: perfectly behaved, perfectly coiffed, perfectly cute. Like Stepford dogs.

It’s the same reason I cringe whenever I hear about those JonBenet Ramsay-style kiddie pageants. There are no tantrums or whining or begging for chicken nuggets. Sure, the stage mothers are full intrigue and back-stabbing. But the kids involved don’t actually act like kids. Read the comments.

Radosh distills the Bishop Williamson event.


Questioning Christian: Keep your identity small
.

End the Drug War

Kathleen Parker writes: Arguments against prohibition should be obvious. When you eliminate the victimless “crime” of drug use, you disempower the criminal element. Neutering drug gangs and cartels, not to mention the Taliban, would be no small byproduct of decriminalization. Not only would state regulation minimize toxic concoctions common on the black market, but also taxation would be a windfall in a hurting economy.

Does Citizenship Need Christianity?

Roger Scruton Via City Journal [Via]

What is needed is not to reject citizenship as the foundation of social order but to provide it with a heart. And in seeking that heart, we should turn away from the apologetic multiculturalism that has had such a ruinous effect on Western self-confidence and return to the gifts that we have received from our Judeo-Christian tradition.

…Forgiveness and irony lie at the heart of our civilization. They are what we have to be most proud of, and our principal means to disarm our enemies. They underlie our conception of citizenship as founded in consent. And they are expressed in our conception of law as a means to resolve conflicts by discovering the just solution to them.

Forgiveness, as Scruton argues, is central to how Christians live in the world. It is the heart of redemption and reconciliation; it is what halts war. His discussion of Irony is more novel. It undermines the timber of certainty that grounds most faith. I’m not sure if I buy his distinctions with Islam just yet; perhaps “forgiveness” is under “mercy” in Islam. And I’m generally skeptical that irony is a grand virtue, especially in the midst of suffering. That said, all is vanity.

Read the rest here.

A Conversation on the Bible and Sexuality

Matt Kennedy and Jan Nunley have a civil discussion about different interpretations of scripture and sex.

Part 2

Part 3

Nunley reorients the discussion away from gender and complementarity. She quotes the Hebrew. Good job.

Via.

Brad Delong Explains

Brad DeLong explains “that the velocity of monetary circulation is an economic variable rather than a technological constant.”

I’ll be referring to this constantly.